High Quality Sale Online Buy Cheap Best Sale Christian Louboutin Python So Kate Pumps 9EdQDZQZY

High Quality Sale Online Buy Cheap Best Sale Christian Louboutin Python So Kate Pumps 9EdQDZQZY
Christian Louboutin Python So Kate Pumps
Tip: All of your saved places can be found here in My Trips.
Log in to get trip updates and message other travellers.
From Review: Gutes Essen of Piazza Restaurant
Tabitha Simmons Idda Laser Cut Booties Cheap Free Shipping JiDn07Fvsp
See all 71 reviews
Outlet With Credit Card Free Shipping Top Quality Kate Spade New York Suede Embossed Pumps Largest Supplier For Sale Pre Order Cheap For Sale 8Qn7sA
of 106 Find Great Sale Online Gianvito Rossi Leather PVCAccented Pumps Cheap Price Free Shipping Free Shipping Wholesale Price K4CKy8wg
Certificate of Excellence
+41 56 210 00 10
$$ - $$$
Outlet 2018 Outlet Free Shipping K Jacques St Tropez Embossed Slingback Sandals Sale Collections Cheap Great Deals Sale Footaction m6PD8
, Central European
Lunch, Dinner, Reservations, Seating, Waitstaff
Other Recent Reviews
“Lovely place and average dishes” 17/06/2017
Marni PointedToe Loafer Pumps Free Shipping Pay With Visa Buy Cheap Store Outlet Classic 0HETD
Free Shipping Pick A Best Cheap Sale Low Shipping Fee Marc Jacobs Embossed LaceUp Boots Amazon Sale Online Choice For Sale pVtNm
Faster Access to TripAdvisor Pictures
Enable Now
Level 6 Contributor
55 reviews
20 restaurant reviews
16 helpful votes
“Gutes Essen”
Reviewed 25 September 2016

Das Gartenrestaurant ist im Sommer eine herrliche Oase, in welcher man ein gutes Essen unter Schatten spendenden Bäumen geniessen kann....

Thank qf001
RominaEttisberger, Geschäftsführer at Piazza Restaurant, responded to this review

Guten Tag qf001 Vielen Dank, dass Sie sich Zeit genommen haben und zu bewerten. Es freut uns natürlich sehr, dass... More



Robert Jon Hendricks represents employers and managers in the travel, hospitality, food service, entertainment, and retail industries in cases brought under California and US federal law involving matters such as wage and hour issues, antidiscrimination laws, and the US Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). As a lead counsel, he has significant experience in state, federal and administrative trials. RJ also has extensive class action experience and has defeated class certification in numerous cases.


Partner, San Francisco

In addition to litigation involving FMLA, RJ handles cases under the California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 et seq., the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act, California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), including Title III.

RJ defended Yusen Terminals in a three-week trial involving a marine clerk’s allegations that she had been unlawfully retaliated against during a training program. The African-American plaintiff claimed that during the training she was segregated in a back room, was not adequately trained by the male union planners; was belittled, harassed, and subjected to death threats; and was ultimately forced to quit the training and could not work for five years afterward because she was broken. The case was filed in 2006, went to a first jury trial, then a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, then a court of appeals decision, and then a remanded second trial. RJ was brought in to first-chair the second trial, and handled jury selection, opening, the cross-examination of the plaintiff, the direct of several company witnesses, and the closing argument—which the client and several observers called the best closing they had ever seen.

As lead counsel, he has successfully defended employment discrimination and arbitration cases. In one case, RJ convinced the court to terminate a contentious litigation brought by a former IT manager who alleged ongoing sexual harassment and retaliation by his supervisor.

RJ has briefed and argued issues before the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and California Courts of Appeal. In one case, he obtained, via a writ petition, a published decision that established that union officials cannot withhold known information that concerns harassment in the workplace from employers during litigation. The decision also found that, like employers, unions are obligated to prevent workplace harassment.

Member, Practice Group of the Year, Employment, (2017)

Listed, California’s Top Labor and Employment Lawyers, (2017)

Recommended, Labor and employment - Labor and employment disputes (including collective actions) - defense, (2017, 2018)

Finalist, ’s Litigation Department of the Year – Labor and Employment (2013)

Member, Executive Committee, State Bar of California Labor and Employment Law Section (2009–2012)

Recipient, Anthony F. Dragonette Memorial Award for Outstanding Achievement in Civil Litigation Trial Practice

Listed, , six of the last seven years

Rated Among the 500 Leading Lawyers in America by Magazine (2007)


February 2018 - We are MorganLewis: Robert JonHendricks

6/6/2014 - California Supreme Court Provides Guidance on Class Certification

1/25/2010 - Excessive Litigation: Engage at Your Own Risk, Daily Journal

Real Cheap Online Stuart Weitzman Leather CapToe Flats Cheap Collections 6ltpqR

Aquazzura Studded Suede Sandals Get Authentic Cheap Online The Cheapest Cheap Online Discount Top Quality Looking For Cheap Online Clearance Brand New Unisex ADnDTPrGmc

1/2/2012 - Litigation Department of the Year, The American Lawyer

3/30/2016 - ABA 2016 National Conference on Equal Employment Opportunity Law

10/28/2015 - Silicon Valley Association of General Counsel 2015 All-Hands Meeting

7/25/2012 - The State Bar of California’s Second Annual Advanced Wage and Hour Conference

Alexandra Neel Suede WrapAround Sandals Discount Cheap Online For Cheap For Sale Discount Manchester K1iQqoNj

Miu Miu Caged Suede Sandals Discount Amazon Buy Cheap Affordable Cheap Order bgp9ldKox

ABA 4th Annual Section of Labor Employment Law Conference

[email protected]

Open in a separate window
Fig. 2

Top: Bland–Altman plots comparing the photographic portion guide and the plated reference portion responses to estimate ‘typical’ participant intake mass (oz) for fish and shrimp. The 95 % CI of the limits of agreement (dashed lines indicating ±2 sd of the mean difference) estimates the magnitude of possible sampling error. The mean difference (solid lines) for the two methods indicates sampling bias; the 95 % CI of the mean difference includes the line of equality (zero) for fish data, but not for shrimp data. Bottom: Distribution plots of differences between participant selections from the photographic portion guide and their plated reference portion. Histograms, supported by goodness-of-fit, indicated fish and shrimp data had a normal distribution

Gender, age and racial characteristics of the study participants: adults aged 25–64 years, south-eastern USA

Open in a separate window

Data presented are the numbers of participants in each demographic category.

Go to:

The present study validated the utility of a photographic guide for assessing typical portion sizes for fish and shrimp consumed by adults. Data accuracy in the study was comparable to or better than that of other reports using photographs for estimating food portions ( 23 Pictures Cheap Online Christian Louboutin Leather Laser Cut Pumps Discount Affordable Comfortable Online Professional t3A9T0DEgC
) . Accuracy in assessing fish and shellfish intake is required to discern how seafood consumption can impact health benefits as well as health risks associated with environmental disasters and contaminants ( 26 28 ) .

Forty-six per cent of respondents in the fish study, and 48 % of respondents in the shrimp study, accurately represented their plated reference portion using the photographic portion guide. Ninety-three per cent of respondents in the fish study, and 91 % of respondents in the shrimp study, represented their plated reference portion ±2 oz (±56·7 g) using the photographic portion guide. Data from both fish and shrimp studies showed positive correlation between the two methods for both fish and shrimp estimates. Such descriptive statistics, however, do not address agreement between the two methods. Bland–Altman plot analyses address potential bias between the mean differences for the two evaluation methods and provide an estimate for an agreement interval, within which 95 % of the differences of the photographic portion guide, compared with the plated reference portions, fall ( 29 ) . These differences ultimately provided acceptable agreement between the two methods from a practical standpoint. Bias in both the fish and shrimp studies was less than 1 oz (28·3 g; Fig. 2 ). Nevertheless, the 95 % CI for mean differences in shrimp study data (+0·77 oz (+21·8 g)) indicated a systematic difference between the methods, indicating a subtraction correction of 0·77 oz (21·8 g) from shrimp portion guide estimates would be expected to provide data more comparable to the ‘gold standard’ plated reference portions. Bias observed in both studies did not appear associated with low v . high portion size preferences.

Get access to all exclusive offers, discounts and deals!
New to JUMIA? Subscribe to our communications to receive special offers and latest news!

Let Us Help You

Get to Know Us

Jumia International

Join us

Payment methods Delivery

Jumia Group